logo Standing Up To Powerful Interests

Testimony Archive

SearchRSS Feed

2/23/2006 FDIC Action Against Payday Lenders Legislative Position Paper

HB 1478


Pennsylvania State Senators

News Room

 

Letter RE FDIC Action Against Payday Lenders

February 23, 2006

Dear Senator,

According to a press release issued by the First Bank of Delaware on February 21, FDIC regulators have directed the bank to discontinue offering “payday” loans. Reports indicate that the basis of the FDIC order were problems in the short-term loan and installment products First Bank of Delaware was marketing and servicing through third-party brokers.

Advance America, which currently operates 101 payday lending centers in Pennsylvania, indicated in a press release issued yesterday that a similar FDIC action may be pending against its partner bank. FDIC intervention may eliminate Advance America’s ability to continue its Pennsylvania payday lending operations. That is why Advance America is pushing HB 1478; HB 1478 exempts the industry from existing Pennsylvania protections as well as FDIC oversight.

HB 1478 opens the door statewide for payday lenders to engage in some of the most predatory aspects of the industry. Not only would HB 1478 insulate payday lenders from many consumer protections under Pennsylvania law, it would allow the industry to operate outside the very guidelines the FDIC enforced against the First Bank of Delaware. FDIC guidelines prevent keeping a payday loan borrower in the product for more than 90 days during any one year. HB 1478 eliminates this cap, giving payday lenders legal authority to keep borrowers in a 400% obligation for far longer. Therefore, HB 1478 effectively deregulates the most predatory aspect of the product. Any attempts to “regulate” the industry through vehicles like HB 1478 will have the effect of weakening consumer protections already in place.

The payday lending issue became a problem in Pennsylvania due to a lack of enforcement. Payday lenders have exploited this situation to create a climate in which any “regulation” is considered an improvement on the status quo. New York and North Carolina are but two examples proving that adequate enforcement of state law is sufficient to eliminate the predatory aspects of payday lending. Attorney General Corbett’s work to shut down an illegal internet-based payday lending operation is evidence that similar efforts can work in Pennsylvania.

We urge you to support SB 101 which would make it even easier to utilize existing state law to eliminate the predatory aspects of payday lending. Please reject HB 1478, which effectively amounts to an industry expansion bill.

Thank you,
Jim Swoyer